Search Results
Letter from J. Ross Clark to R. E. Wells, February 16, 1912
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Discussion of the necessity of someone patrolling the Las Vegas Springs for security.
Text
Letter from R. E. Wells (Los Angeles) to W. H. Bancroft, February 23, 1912
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Wells expressed his opinion that it was not a good time to discontinue having someone patrol the pipeline and springs.
Text
Letter from Walter R. Bracken (Las Vegas) to H. I. Bettis (Los Angeles), April 13, 1912
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Following complaints from the ice plant about low water pressure, Bracken discovered a leak in the pipeline and a partially blocked intake at the springs.
Text
Letter from J. Ross Clark to R. E. Wells, April 19, 1912
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Clark suggests that if the horse patrol was to continue, the company should buy their own horse to save money. Additionally, the long time between patrols would still afford many opportunities for a saboteur or striker to damage the water facilities.
Text
Letter from T. P. Cullen (Los Angeles) to H. C. Nutt, May 11, 1912
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Letter stating the importance of the water supply to Las Vegas, and how the company should consider replacing the pipeline with concrete conduit.
Text
Letter from Walter R. Bracken (Las Vegas) to F. R. McNamee (Los Angeles), November 20, 1912
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Workers installing sewer lines disturbed the water mains, which would cause many future problems, and Bracken was asking the company lawyer how to proceed.
Text
Letter from J. Ross Clark to H. C. Nutt (Los Angeles), August 29, 1913
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Despite the fact that people were beginning to drill their own wells in the area, it was not worth buying up land to prevent others from drilling while land prices were high.
Text
Letter from H. C. Nutt (Salt Lake City) to J. Ross Clark (Los Angeles), September 16, 1913
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Nutt and Bancroft agreed that it was not necessary to purchase more land to protect the Las Vegas Springs area.
Text
Letter from Arthur Maguire (Los Angeles) to W. H. Comstock, March 9, 1918
Date
Archival Collection
Description
Letter describing how the company had spent nearly $4000 on pipeline maintenance and still it leaked badly. Maguire recommends replacing 4000 feet of pipeline.
Text
Letter from W. H. Comstock (Los Angeles) to H. V. Platt and J. Ross Clark regarding a damaged Las Vegas pipeline, March 11, 1918
Date
Archival Collection
Description
The company had three options for replacing the damaged pipeline, and Comstock wanted advice on which he should choose.
Text