UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at [email protected].
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
WATER LITIGATION MHDDY RIVER. Ix>8 Angeles, Oct. 23, 1915. Mr. A. S. Halstead, Bldg. ' i * Dear Sir: Returning your f i l e in the above matter w ill say that I represent Knox and Holmes as p la in tiffs in the original water suit now pending, involving their rights to a portion 6f the water of the River. In so fa r as the Railroad is concerned we have a prescriptive right to the user of water at Moapa, and our water at St. Thomas is supplied from a well sunk on our right of way and is percolating water, which, under our decisions in Nevada, belongs to the owner of the s o il. Waters> however, as a precaution, at the Thomas 1branch was completed, purchased one ? L Si ° Ck in Muddy Valley Irrig a tio n Company, which the Company now owns. This is su fficien t fo r a ll purposes. I K S A f d0 think i t wise fo r the Company to eon-vey its water right to the Muddy Valley Irriga tio n Com-that’ has^be^^fpvYfS0^ i j r f £*mpf that has been levied on the stock and yo pf ayw htihche athssee sCsommenl pany w ill have notice la te r. Very truly yours,
