UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
'm Los Angeles - June 1 1 , 1 9 5 3 36-15-Nev. Mr. L. R. Maagt cc: j ^ v I enclose suggested draft of letter to be written to subdividers making application for water main extensions which letter has been approved by Mr. Reinhardt. I presume, under your current practice, you will continue to send to Mr. Reinhardt all necessary data for his prior approval of any proposed contracts and that having secured that approval, you will then furnish the Water District with necessary copies of the enclosed letter for their approval, returning two copies to you, one for their file and one for transmittal to the subdivider, and at that time you will also furnish the water District necessary data with respect to the nature of the proposed work to be done including the estimated cost thereof. This procedure may seem somewhat unwieldy but I think it is the only one we can legally follow. Meanwhile, I am still working to have the City rescind its present regulation with respect to any other form of letter from the Water Company. E. E. Bennett Enc to each
