UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
to RE: I & S DOCKET NO 142, CASE NO. 1221. Los Angeles, June 25, 1953 (cc - Mr. L. R. Maag Mr. C. M. Cory) Mr. Wm. Reinhardt: I hand you herewith copy of Opinion and Order of the Public Service Commission of Nevada on the above subject. It is pretty difficult to follow the language of the Commission in its Opinion and at the present time I am not in a position to determine what the difference in revenue and rates would be from those ordered by the Commission in the Order in this case and those contained in the tariff submitted sometime ago which was suspended by the Commission. I am sending Mr. Maag a copy of this letter and of the Opinion and Order and would appreciate it if he would work up data showing that information and possibly prepare a new rate schedule, or as Mr. Allen calls it "an amended rate No. 21", and see what it looks like and how it looks from a revenue standpoint. After I have that information, I will be in a position to file a re-hearing in this case. Mr. Maag may also desire to analyze the financial results of the various waivers of outstanding charges or overcharges contained in the Commission's Opinion beginning at the bottom of Page 12 and continuing on to Page 14. E n d s . C. H. K. J U N 2 6 1 9 5 3
