Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000269 169

Image

File
Download upr000269-169.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000269-169
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. 9. H. Hulwiser * -2 - the depreelation rate should be reduced, the tax Charge in excess af taxaa actually paid should ha eliminated, and the maintenance sfcarge eliminated since no credit la sllewed l a the haea valuation fa r aeernad depreciation. The Commission has stated i t expects thaaa matters to ha adjusted at ite September seating} we hare hut slight defense for any of the points of objection raieed by the CoBsaission. It must ha admitted that la an extravagant rata of lettered!, there is no present outlook which would impel the Commission to view the LVL&f water fa c ilitie s as having other than reasonably long life * there is ns shrinkage in the wains of the plant because at any threatened re* doe ties in water rates, which hare been unchanged since l# | l and are con* eidsred the lowest in the State, or because ef a threatened coapetltive water system, and accordingly the Commission relates depreciation to wear and tear only, for which purpose 1 haliers kji is extravagant and particu­la rly so than applied to a ll of the property without regard for age or kind, and when Charges fo r rehabilitation are not offset by deprediatien. The Ceaadssiea holds there is no justification for the payasnt of LVXAi to Lft&SL of taxes which wars net directly levied against the latter} in other words, the Commission does not approve an arbitrary segregation of taxes not loried on specific items of property. Commissioner Sexton eon-teade ( l ) the I J M t aseeswaent as deteralned by t&@ fax Commission dots net contemplate the inclusion of property not used in the operation ef the railroad. (2) that the railroad assessment includes only that part of the joint fa c ilitie s used in the operation of the railroad and ( 3 ) tho portion of tho joint fa c ilitie s used by LVh«8 should be locally assessed. I f Mr. Sexton presses this matter n o t only w ill a local assessment issue against thie joint fac ility property, but local assessment w ill be extab-* llshed for a ll railroad property not used in ths operation of the railroad, as the lands fronting on Main Street and CUsfe Arenas in the Las Vegas yard area, which are covered by industrial or ether leases. Mr. Sexton wants an adjustment In cur present accounting practise, and particularly in the joint fac ility rentals} ths fax Commission has requests* these adjustments be made. I m satisfied it is not to our best interest to refuse to comply with theee dasmnds. I f we continue to refuse to »»*«> any concession whatsoever we invite peremptory action on the pert of the Commission which w ill prove costly. - Charles *