Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000217 67

Image

File
Download upr000217-067.tif (image/tiff; 23.4 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000217-067
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Los Angeles - June 1 3 , 1945 Grig SPA Gy BHP-Omaha A He: APE 20 approved Jan 30, 19^5 for Well No. 11 and pipe line at I#s Vegas, amt $6 5 ,860, and to our subsequent recommendation that program outlined for this eapendlture be changed and extended, requiring additional appropriation. Our authorization for amortization requires work be com­menced by Aug 4, 1945. Our WPB approval states QUOTE Unless construc­tion started 70 days from date of issuanoe (which date Is April 11th) the permit is automatically revoked UNQUOTE. This would mean start­ing by June 20th. However, in another portion of the form it states: QUOTE Expiration Bate: July 3 1 , 1945 UNQUOTE. If we desire to protect these two authorizations I can arrange by contract to excavate ditches for the pipe lines leading from Wells 8 , 9 and 10 to site of proposed settling basin, and place order for the pipe lines. The expense would come well within Author­ization of APE 20 and would I believe protect us in WPB and amortiza­tion approvals. This program would of course be contingent upon our anticipation project recommended my letter April 2 3 , 19 4 5 , will be approved substantially as proposed. I think this should be given careful consideration; other­wise we should ask for extension of time limit for performance of the work. 3-33 • W H.J. JUN 1 3 1945 FS