Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000170 202

Image

File
Download upr000170-202.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000170-202
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Las Vegas - July 18, 1946, *-83 Hr. Frank Strong: 6 Please note attached from Assistant Superin­tendent regarding bill for $367.So covering repairs to a broken sewer main across Las Vegas Creek In the Slltmore Addition. Sines reoelrlng this memo I have endeavored to seoure some Information on the subjeot. Larkin advises the sewer main was damaged by dragline oleanlng out tha orekk. He sent the bill to tha City and they returned It to Simp he sent It to Horrlson-Knudsen Company who also returned It with advice that they were partially responsible but did not feel that they should pay tha full ooet because the former vitrified olpy line was replaced with oaet Iron. So now he la billing the Railroad Company. Hie charge Is esorbltant for repairing a break In a dewer line but Larkin advisee that thle Is due to the faot that the ooffer dam broke loose before the oement was set and they had to do the Job over again. I do not feel that the Railroad Company Is res­ponsible for this bill but certainly someone should pay the plumber for his work. l assume Horrlson-Xnudsen were oovered by publlo liability Insurance. VALTER R. BRAOEEM