Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000160 162

Image

File
Download upr000160-162.tif (image/tiff; 23.24 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000160-162
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    H Mr, C a lv in M, Cory March 25, 1952 Territory may o r may n o t, f o r the purpose o f exemption, include "special assessment dis­tricts so created, sucji as road, water, sew­er, gas, light, reclamation, drainage, irri­gation, levee, school, harbor, port improve­ment', and similar districts and divisions o f a State or Territory." I n th e E s ta te o f A lexander Shamberg, 144 Fed. 2d 99$j th e Second C ir c u it Court by a d iv id e d c o u r t h e ld th e P o rt o f New York A u th o rity to be a p o l i t i c a l s u b d iv is io n and th e i n t e r e s t on i t s bonds to be ta x exem pt. See a ls o Commissioner v« W hite Ts E s ta te , 144 Fed. 2d 1019, in v o lv - frig th e feoncfe o f“ th e tri-S o ro u g h B ridge A u th o rity . These d e c is io n s w ill g iv e you an in s ig h t in to some o f th e fac­t o r s w hich may be c o n t r o ll in g . The case o f In Re O rosl P u b lic U t i l i t y D i s t r i c t . 196 C al. 43, d is tin g u is h e s be-riw e'erii'd istricts' w hich a re tr u e p u b lic c o rp o ra tio n s and s p e c ia l d i s t r i c t s w hich a re not e n t i t i e s . | might say that it is my offhand opinion that the Las Vegas Valley Water District exercises part of the sovereign powers of the itate of Nevada and should be classified as a political subdivision within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code sections. It also appears to me that under present-day conditions the furnishing of water should be considered a public purpose. These, of course, are only tentative views, and when I have had the benefit of further research, including any Nevada decisions which you can'refer rae to, I will give Mr, Rouse my opinion, I am also going to suggest to him that it would be very dangerous to act in this case upon the opinion of counsel and that our New York office, which handles in­come tax matters, should attempt to obtain a closing ft— greement or a ruling from the Internal Revenue Bureau prior t© the consummation of the proposed transfer# You understand, of course, that the matter of a do­nation rather than a sale is only being given study, and we would not like the District to get wind of the fact that there is any possibility of a donation. £ECnRe:lM .2 5. E. Bennett