Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000156 164

Image

File
Download upr000156-164.tif (image/tiff; 26.62 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000156-164
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    85. computation of total annual costs, but It must be noted that this figure is not considered definite and is used only as the best figure available. In estimating the total annual cost, it was assumed that the schedule of construction will be as follows: (1) Water Storage and Distribution Project. All \ ( facilities shown on Figure 17 will be provided in 1950. (2) Water Supply. The 20-inch and 42-lnch water supply line between EMI and Las Vegas will be constructed now with one booster station. The intake and pipe line from Lake Mead to the junction will be constructed in 1958. In computing costs, the work has been largely confined to the urban area and to Paradise Valley. Also, no reduction is made for the sale of treated sewage. If, as suggested previously, the distribution and sale of water to Henderson, Carver Park and Victory Village Is also relegated to the Water District, these sales at the same rate as to other areas served by the District may tend to lower the average cost per million gallons of water. In the interests of con­servatism, these possibilities have not been incorporated into the anticipated annual costs. The total estimated annual costs and the average cost per million gallons of water are given in Table 21. This table indicates the following total annual costs: