Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000153 92

Image

File
Download upr000153-092.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000153-092
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Las Vegas, Nevada EVENING- REVIEW-JOURNAL, Sept. 16, 19^8. E £. B SEP 20 1948 / 7 A 4 $ For Water District Vote Clark county commissioners yesterday set October :? 19 as the date when affected residents w in decide on formation of the Las Vegas valley water district. On the date of the long-await­ed election, certain residents also w ill vote for one director m their division to represent them in a board comprised from the seven divisions. Commissioners yesterday also named candidates for each of the seven divisions from a list of names proposed by the cham­ber of commerce. ’ - District Attorney Robert K Jones said qualified voters will have two propositions to decide: One—should toe w ater dis­trict be created?; and t w o - vote fo r one candidate to rgj.- resent them in their - j . divisferaiiy the following divis­ions w ill be created, and voters from these divisions will vote on creation of the district and for one director. These were Pitt­man, Whitney, Arm y air base, North Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Par­adise Valley and the highway 91 strip. Candidates named by commis­sioners to run were Harry M il­ler and f ’loyd Prowell, division 1; Frank T5trdhj^JiThornas A. Camp­bell and 'Ryland Taylor, division 2; James Cashman and Howard Cannon, division 3; G. William Coulthard and Victor Shurtleff, d iv isio n ^ Lor in Ronnow and A1 Corradeiti; -'division 5; Spencer Butterfield, Nelson Conway and U. C. Nickerson, division d, and John Bunch and John Stafford^ division 7. Plans for the , comprehensive water district were proposed to provide an adequate water sup-: b ply for the county’s growing pop­ulation. Under the program, the dis- ^ trict directors would be charged with all water consumed in the. area,. take, over the holdings of the Las Vegas Land and Water company and coordinate all serv­ices.