Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
C-2319^702 2 M\v 1C:9“ *19*54 Omaha - May 1#, 1954* Mr. E. E. Bennett (Los Angeles): (cc - Mr. A. E. Stoddard Mr. Wm. Reinhardt, Los Angeles. Mr. W. H. Hulsizer Mr. R. M. Sutton Mr. Calvin M. Cory, Las Vegas. Mr. C. M. Bates, Los Angeles. Mr. L. R. Maag, Las Vegas. Mr. L. L. Burri) sale of the Las Vegas water system to Las Vegas Valley Water District, and to your further letter to me only of May 14th, which, with attached copy of Mr. RenwickTs letter to Mr. McNameeof the same date, advises of changes in the proposed escrow instructions tentatively agreed to between Mr. Renwick and Mr. Hamilton of the Water District: M Pbea &e" h2av> eS.e"ction II, line 15. The word "has” should rAU' ?age Section III, paragraph 4, line 9. There is V intentionally omitted from the proposed document of easement described in this paragraph the pipe line (JJ-Q) described in subparagraph (K-6) of paragraph (k) of Section 1 of the Sale Agreement. This omission is explained in Mr. Renwick*s above letter by the fact that an easement for this pipe line has already been granted by the Railroads to" the Water Company and that the Water Company will in turn convey its easement to the District on the sale date. If this arrangement is satisfactory to the District, I have no objection to it. . 3) Pages 3 and 4» Section III. Mr. Renwick says that ^6- it has been tentatively agreed that paragraph 3 of Section III be eliminated and all remaining paragraphs in that section be renumbered accordingly. There is no objection. Referring enclosing copies of to your letter of May 6th relative to, and proposed escrow instructions incidental to I offer the following comments: 1.