Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000095 22

Image

File
Download upr000095-022.tif (image/tiff; 26.55 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000095-022
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

WILLIAM COULTHARD SECY. “TSE AS, 900 SOUTH 5TH STREET HARRY E. MILLER E. OTTO UNDERHILL ®65% m?"1953 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA JAMES CASHMAN JOHN BUNCH /X TELEPHONE 5920 zMZ- February 24th, 1953. g. B. & MAR 2 1953 P. O. Box 1448 Union Pacific Railroad Company, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company Las Vegas Land and Water Company Attention: Mr. E.E. Bennett Dear Sir: The Las Vegas Valley Water District hag been in­formed that the City of Las Vegas desires an easement area in the South fifty (50) feet of the SE^ of Section 31, Town­ship 20 South, Range 61 East in the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada, for roadway purposes. It is our understand­ing that the City of Las Vegas has formally requested an easement for such purpose, which will he available for the installation of a sewer to serve Hyde Park Tract and residen tial developments in that area. We have been informally advised that you may be re­luctant to grant such an easement because of a possible con­flict with our formal proposal to you dated January 31st,1953. Please be advised that the Las Vegas Valley Water District has no objection to the granting of such an easement and that in the event you grant sueh an easement, it will not be deemed by us to affect our aforesaid proposal. I have discussed this matter informally with other members of the Board of Directors, but it will be approximately two or three weeks before we can have another meeting, at which time a formal resolution in the form attached hereto will be adopted. You will be furnished with a duly executed copy at that time. In the meantime, I thought this letter might ex­pedite consideration of this matter. ily yours WATER DISTRICT YnbmasA. Campbell •ident