Information
Digital ID
upr000060-110
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Las Yeg&a «* October 18, «2H Hr* fc Reinhardts { m Hr* E* 1* Bennett ) Su -plecmtiMg my letter October Xbth, ragerdiag request fra® Milo Bsrties OcsasdUsion Httt we redlsasliy Jgpgp for water. service furnished to auto courts and motels* As outdated In Hr* Bennett1# letter* October 17th, we have considered the loss which would he sustained by the suggea ted compromise, and find th t the charge# for toilet and baths in the 53 auto oourts listed in state- stent attached to our letter September Xbt& would total t3do*50 per month# ?h& offset or edit against this loss varies with the vacancies and tourist business In Las f«®a#f for instance during February the auto court- vacancy allowaaoes totaled 1278*50, therefore the net lose to the water company would m $32*00 per month or $S®3*00 per year m this basis. This is considerable, but not in co^carlaon with the loss of 1720*90 per month, or $8,650 per year which wotsld result from application of the hotel rate which the petitioners request* A* K* Folg-ur