Information
Digital ID
upr000040-049
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Las Vegas -April 26, 19^8 w 23-3-3 Mr. Frank Strong; X attaoh copy of letter from the Planning Commission with regard to the future layout of roads west of Rancho Road, adjoining our property. For ready reference I also enclose print on which X have shown In yellow the proposed 60* roadway between OPSR property and that owned by Messrs Kaltenbosn and Griffith. As we noted today, Kaltenborn has a line of trees planted along the fence with a roadway on hia own property just south of the trees* From our standpoint, it would not be desirable to have a roadway In this Xooation for “Sunday drivers* to wander around the springs and wells. Some time ago we had a request to donate a 301 strip along south edge of the K<enborn-Grlff1th acreage (shown on attached in orange) so that 0. Scherer, a local contractor, could secure F.R.A. financing on homes he planned to build in the Wollenzien Tract* the SWf of Section 32, Into which we have laid some water mains. *hls would permit traffle from the Wollenzlen Tract two outlets, one on Charleston Hvd., and the other on Rancho Road, and this latter request seems more reasonable. If you concur, X will so advise the Planning Commission. A. M. Folg°r