Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000255 260

Image

File
Download upr000255-260.tif (image/tiff; 26.88 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000255-260
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    BCC: Mr. Wm. Reinhardt - VVM. R- /\UG 20 1953 August 20, 19S3 File; 80-12 Mr. Robert A. Allen, Chairman, Nevada public Service Commission, Carson City, Nevada Bear Mr. Alien; Referring to your letter of AupuBt 10th and supplementibg my letter to you of August 13th in ooimeotlon with the trans­fer of the water production facilities of the Union Pacific Railroad Company to the Las Vegas Land and Water Company. You are correct that the contract* vhleh Imre been in force between the railroad company and various users either have been cancelled or are in the course of cancellation or termination and the Water Company has taken, over the service to these Industries and Is making charges under its appropriate tariff provisions. However, it is not entirely oorrect that the later Company is charging more than the railroad company formerly charged in all instances. 1 am attaching a statement showing the charges mad# by the railroad eosip&ny for the period from Movember 1902 to April 1900 and charges since then being made under the later Company1e appropriate tariff rate®. Ion will note that there are M a c five Instances where there has been a reduction, in some oases material, in the charges heretofore paid by these industries and in other cases the increases, with'the exception of that to J.R Henderson, have been relatively minor. In connection with the Henderson matter, you will recall that several years ago we had considerable discussion with respect to the then existing rates charged to thee® ready mix concrete plants, especially one operated by Young & Smith Ready Mix Concrete Company. This company is in the same ^ V m £ ftyS 1953