Information
Digital ID
upr000280-216
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Mr R. Ecus• W * © February 1, 1952 Hs advised Mr, Allen that he thought a petition for rehearing could be drawn which would not be embarrassing to the Commission, Mr, Allen then stated that if w® filed a petition for rehearing, he would give it serious consideration, I have discussed the matter with Mr. Reinhardt and w© both feel that w© should file a petition for rehearing and give the Commission an opportunity to re-open the case. If it does not do so promptly, there will be no reasonable alternative except to proceed with the court action, foday I have filed a petition for re-hearing and am enclosing to you, and sending to each of the parties to whoa a copy of this letter is going, a copy thereof. If the rehearing is granted, I propose to have the bulk of the testimony put in by members of the staffs of Mr. Hulsiaer and Mr, Sutton. However both Mr. Reinhardt and I agree that Mr, ¥©he should be retained to prepare some exhibits relating to a forecast of operations for the year 1952, I have asked Mr. Veh© to be ready to start preparation on short notice, I will keep you advised of further developments in the case. I. S. Bennett Enel*