Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
? A. 1. Stoddard) lafla. Reinhardt ) W. R. Rouse - ) W. H. Hulsizer) R*-M.--Sutton -) W. H. Johnson*) Calvin M. Cory) one copy of re; sheets to eaclt December 17, 1951 File 4705-11-22 D* || B DEC 17 1951 Mr. Lee S. Scott, Secretary W M . R. Public Service Commission of Mevada DEC 17 1951 Carson City, Nevada Dear Mr* Scott: ^ I enclose First Revised Slioft PSCH Mo. 2, First Revised Sheet PSCH Mo* 5 and Original Sheet PSCH lo. 5A in the tariff of water rates of the Las Vegas Land and Water Company at Las Vegas, Mevada. These sheets eliminate motels from rate Item Mo. 9 and establish new rates for motels under rate Item 37A. The rate changes mentioned are not made voluntarily by the Las Vegas Land and Water Company, and the tariff sheets above mentioned are sent to you for filing solely in compliance with the Order of the Commission dated December 10,1951, which purports t© have been made at a general session of the Commission on December 7, 1951. The above mentioned rate changes are made and the tariff sheets are sent you for filing under protest for the reason that the Order of the Commission above mentioned is unlawful and arbitrary for the following reasons? 1. it provides for a retroactive reduction in rates« 2. The rate changes required further reduce the revenues of the Las Vega® Land and Water Company and take its property without due process of law. 3. The Order is not supported by the evidence, but is contrary to the evidence in I & 3 Docket Mo. 127. 4* We are informed and believe that the Order was made as a result of a complaint made by the mo- DEG 18 1951 L* C. feu