Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000110 76

Image

File
Download upr000110-076.tif (image/tiff; 26.98 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000110-076
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Las Vegas - Maroh 16, 1953 Mr* E*E. Bennett col Mr* fra* Reinhardt Referring to our conversation this date I en sending you herewith copy of letter from Mr. G.J. f u l l s t e l a to Mr. L.V* Peart, (copy to me) dated at Omaha, March 6, 1953 in vhioh it is suggested that I take necessary action to collect from fillard V* Keen, Fireman at Hoya, -157*50 due LYL<£f0o. for room rent in room­ing house at Las Vegas* The unpaid rent of 0157*50 covers the period of January, 1952 to July, ^22*50 per month* 1352 inclusive, or 7 months at I understand that Mr* Keen has now Brought action against the Railroad Company for 150,000 in a suit for damages in a personal injury case* I have a copy of Form 20 authorising a deduction of 120*00 per month signed by Mr. Keen and dated September 12, 19 50 copy of which ie also attached* I also understand that Mr* Keen has cteaikveens tcheo maptetnisatutidoen tfhoatr hael lweigleld pianjyu rtyh*i s' bach room rent when he re­As I see it, if Mr* Keen is still employed by the Railroad Company, there are two courses of action open to me, one of which is to submit the payroll deduction authorisation for 120*00 per month wtaog eMsr** V*f• Smith for collection* or, to proceed to garni0he0 his It is not quite dear to me why previous action has not been taken in this case, but in any event, X would appreciate your advice and recommendation in this matter before proceeding. Enos* L*R# Haag