Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000061 204

Image

File
Download upr000061-204.tif (image/tiff; 26.01 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000061-204
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

/?’ " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 erage user fer the year 1950 for the iWTi## given Las Vegas City for rate making pi^ea«tt 1* end unfair, In that, on the basis of Commissioner Malone** statement of' $8,006.00 per second foot, figwrirtg the maximum u«r 87 your petit loner to be approximately six cubic feet per second, the value should he not - less than five times greater than that fined by your petitioner* 3rd. The elimination of Buie 10 from the Bales and Ksgu~ latlena under conditions that obtain at las gagas will fee in* equitable and unjust'# and -sill work a reel hardship on your pe­titioner, in that, a spsettlstiv*' feature has entered into a considerable portion of the area of' the City of Las Vegas, and unless .there is a reasonable charge allowed by your Commission for the tapping of water mains, demands will be made from time to time by numerous persons for water service for the tapping of the water main*, and connections fro® the mains to Inside of the property lines of the respective lot owners» solely for the purpose of enhancing. the value of their lots and not for the purpose of tilting, using and paying for water service. %e order of the. Ceaeanissten recites that Bale 10 is dis­allowed for the reason that it conflicts with Buie f providing that tbs Company shall furnish service to the property line of each consumer • Buies f and 10 were submitted to fmr C«a»lsaien by your petitioner for the reason that praetieslly the same rules sad regulations have been1in use under the franchise now In feree granted by the board of County Commissioners of Clark County on m#W