Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Of Errors In Water Parley •Leo A. McNamee today denied he had any authority to speak for the Las Vegas Land & Water company on the subject of sale of their distribution facility here . to; the city of Las Vegas when the matter was discussed at a Meeting with the city commission last week. “ At the conference in ( dues - | tion,” McNamee states, some- I one asked the question. Why doesn’t the -city buy the Land and Water company? “ I as an individual, asked toe general question as to whether or not the city was interested in discussing the matter, and ex- Sressly stated that I had no authority to speak for the water company. “ One of the commissioners present stated that the city would be interested if the price was right I remarked that I had read in a paper some months ago that one of the Land and Water company made some kind of a statement relative to selling the water com-tvcmv and one of the commis-ffone’rs remarked that the official’s statement was only a general one and that no detailshad ever been expressed, submitted or discussd. . “ Someone then questioned as to the valuation of the Las Vegas Land & Water company, and someone else present, not l, stated that he had seen m a booklet" where the Land and Water company was assessed at around $1,200,000. The book *5® company, was not mentioned by l i p ‘ ‘There, - was -no plan. or -anyi discussion of. a plan to name a speciiS 'bomihittee for- the | pose of making an investigation of the feasibility of the proj'ect of buying I the Land & Water com- pany, nor was there any statement. that the company was prepared to send representatives Jot the purpose of exploring or discussing the matter. - “ Since June, 1946, I have not represented the Las Vegas Land & Water company,, except on one special occasion which had no connection with the sale of its: I business.’’ : Commissioner R o b e r t T. 1 Moore said this morning that a; committee probably wonld be appointed Wednesday from among the newly named citizen’s advisory board to study the proposed pur chase of the water company’s holdings here and that he felt it was a step in the right 1 direction. Under the provisions of the city charter and the franchise held by the utility, the property may not be sold without the ciy of Las Vegas^firsb being .given, an opportunity t6 purc^a.set -' ’ ? ... - — - - - O r % 2 rM a.; Icgft i i