Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000342 93

Image

File
Download upr000342-093.tif (image/tiff; 23.93 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000342-093
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Of Errors In Water Parley •Leo A. McNamee today denied he had any authority to speak for the Las Vegas Land & Water company on the subject of sale of their distribution facility here . to; the city of Las Vegas when the matter was discussed at a Meeting with the city commis­sion last week. “ At the conference in ( dues - | tion,” McNamee states, some- I one asked the question. Why doesn’t the -city buy the Land and Water company? “ I as an individual, asked toe general question as to whether or not the city was interested in discussing the matter, and ex- Sressly stated that I had no au­thority to speak for the water company. “ One of the commissioners present stated that the city would be interested if the price was right I remarked that I had read in a paper some months ago that one of the Land and Water company made some kind of a statement relative to selling the water com-tvcmv and one of the commis-ffone’rs remarked that the offi­cial’s statement was only a gen­eral one and that no detailshad ever been expressed, submitted or discussd. . “ Someone then questioned as to the valuation of the Las Vegas Land & Water company, and someone else present, not l, stated that he had seen m a book­let" where the Land and Water company was assessed at around $1,200,000. The book *5® company, was not mentioned by l i p ‘ ‘There, - was -no plan. or -anyi discussion of. a plan to name a speciiS 'bomihittee for- the | pose of making an investigation of the feasibility of the proj'ect of buying I the Land & Water com- pany, nor was there any state­ment. that the company was pre­pared to send representatives Jot the purpose of exploring or dis­cussing the matter. - “ Since June, 1946, I have not represented the Las Vegas Land & Water company,, except on one special occasion which had no connection with the sale of its: I business.’’ : Commissioner R o b e r t T. 1 Moore said this morning that a; committee probably wonld be ap­pointed Wednesday from among the newly named citizen’s ad­visory board to study the pro­posed pur chase of the water com­pany’s holdings here and that he felt it was a step in the right 1 direction. Under the provisions of the city charter and the franchise held by the utility, the property may not be sold without the ciy of Las Vegas^firsb being .given, an opportunity t6 purc^a.set -' ’ ? ... - — - - - O r % 2 rM a.; Icgft i i