Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000160 10

Image

File
Download upr000160-010.tif (image/tiff; 23.12 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000160-010
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    IAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL Monday, Sept. 19t 1949 McNamee Of Errors In Water Parley Leo A. MeNamee today denied he had any authority to speak for the Las Vegas Land & Water I company on the subject of sale of their distribution facility here ; to the city of Las Vegas when the matter was discussed at a meeting with the city commis­sion last week. “At the conference in ques - tion,” McNamee states, “some­one asked the question: Why doesn’t the city buy the Land and Water company?’ ' “I, as an individual, asked the general question as to whether or not the city was interested in discussing the matter, and ex­pressly stated that I had no au- •hority 'to speak for the water! company. “One of the commissioners j present stated that the city would ! fee. interested if the price was i right. I remarked that I had j read in a paper some months I ago that one. of the Land and Water company officials had made some kind of a statement relative to selling the water com­pany, and one of the commis­sioners remarked that the offi-1 eial’s statement,was only a gen­eral one and that no details had ever been expressed, submitted J or discussd. “Someone then questioned as I to the valuation of the Las Vegas Land & Water company, and' someone else present, not I,I stated that he had seen in a hook- i let where the Land and Water' company was assessed at around $1,200,000. The book value of the company was not mentioned by i anyone. “ There was no plan or any discussion of a plan to name a special committee for the pur-, pose of making an investigation I ©f the feasibility of the project of buying the Land & Water earn- j pany, nor was there any f state­ment, that the company was pre-. pared to send representatives for: the purpose of exploring or dis­cussing the matter. “Since June, 1946, I have not represented the Las Vegas Land & Water company, except on one special occasion which had no j connection with the sale of its i business.” Commissioner R o b e r t T . : Moore said this morning that a committee probably would be ap­pointed Wednesday from among the newly named, citizen’s ad- s visory board to study the pro­posed purchase of the water com­pany’s holdings here and that he felt it was a step in the right direction. Under the provisions of the city charter and the franchise f held by the utility, the property • may not be: sold without the ciy of Las Vegas first being given an opportunity to purchase. ,, „ -----v a— . ........... ? H I