Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000289 4

Image

File
Download upr000289-004.tif (image/tiff; 26.12 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000289-004
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

| $ l u b b y U a l l e y J l r v i y a t t o t t Q u m t p a t t y IN' CORPORATKD A 1 ^ S . P . L . A. & S . L . R . R . C&YERTON, IsTEVADA Los A n g e le s , C a la . Oct. 13, 1915. le y I r r t l a t L r o o S p a n r ^ f i S o m ^ o u r ^ h e L ^ r i o r t w o Psuit s“ Updedny dVinagl “ the Muddy R iver i t s and uid Holmes, v; Co. vs 1 , p .b efo re the courts in which vour rip-btc, + ~ + >,« " " I g o ? r the proceedure the to a lso l e t you know what f £ 5 ^ S S l S t t ? e v;aters o f K r iv e r , and holders in aid in g g et it s a ffo ? | ny• expec.ts jfe y °u> as one o f i t s stoc; ypoousri tiroignh ttso* go into clu^t Pp ?ooppefrriyir ianndd ntthhear^e\by fc?u?l liyth partoj tei lc tw iU be i n W W. M«^Kear nevU* s ta Wp P6 * the f i r s t is that of Knox the. S&cond. one is' th a t^ f^ th e Moapa ‘ a n d ^ I it ' l ^ r pCor^riiss^on er> and K e a rn e y state-E n gin eer and L. | | § lr he Engineer and Commissioner are enjoined by the Court from en terin g ing t-ne iiov/ of water from the Rever *in «to« * t»h eir headgateSs t ohr od^itschg eSsf a t - tS a o f 8 ” t0 take fr0m the » » * : o f t L water ?toy d e ilr e p ,vpr VlZ ?n?i n t i f f ?uin the f l r s t su it are e n tit le d to water from the th e ir c l - i S s ^ r e ?nihan sev enty~ei.ght. acres; while in th e ir complaint second s u it is e n + i+ i^ f f °Uf hundred acres; the P l a i n t i f f in the hundred aid tp waJ®r from the r iv e r fo r not more than a huhdred l i d fn tu r ® t le re s * , l n i t s complaint i t s claims are fo r e ig h t +addr®d+ nd f o r ty acres, thus you see, the water claimed bv these on P r 1®S * n access o f What we b e lie v e to be th e ir law ful r ig h t 0 equeals about one-fourth o f the e n tire flow o f t h e R iv e r . S ' „ U ine company s attorn eys advise the D irecto rs to supply the State s e S i i t i l y le t h l t eb?aiX d i i den-+ ^ith WhiCh t0 flS h t eac^P° f these cases, S t I f the n§ 1S p osslb le a s a tis fa c to r y s e t t le - atHnbd spttoLCkKMhollddeinrsl d f , thq gCSom panhy a?th/ ana t wao umldu chb e lepsoss sciboslet ai nf d thexe peCnomsep antoy °u it Thev warn llhk *m d6r+ sh°uld entervene or becomeparties to the P l a i n t i f f o f ect ° r s > however, that i t is very probable the ers as p a rtie s HPSkSf'i,1??8 mf yVJGt name the c °mpany and i t s stockhold­tehr ®e CrroinuSrtt ri?t+sQePlifi, uithpoI n i t s aowndn mhaovtei onth, emm aby roduo ghsot ; inthtoe y cfouurrtth, ero r atdhvaiste ITe t o ihr th S sabisfacatro ryn 0st ebttrloeumSehnt t ino f hyth e questitohne mp alav,i nptoisfsf ii boly? not be had under the decision s that w i l l be given bv the Court in the pending cases , and th at, in the event o f s§ch con tlm en cv the Company wouW then be under the n e c e s s r V o f i t s e l f 1 S n “ ng a