Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000065 167

Image

File
Download upr000065-167.tif (image/tiff; 23.4 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000065-167
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Re: LVL&WCO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COB-MISSION OF NEVADA Los Angeles, April 30, 1952 47-11-104 Mr. ¥. H. Johnson: I understand that the court case will probably be set for trial on June 30, 1952. Roy Wehe will be in Los Angeles in the early part of the week of May 26, 1952, for the purpose of making exhibits estimating 1952 calendar year operations. He will want to discuss revenues and expenses with you at that time. I will let you know at a later date the date when it would be most convenient for him to meet with you in Los Angeles. I presume that you can ar­range to be here. In the meantime I think you should review the ma­terial sent me with your letters of February 19th and March $, 1952, and let me know if any changes should be made therein. i I think the material shown on revised pages 7 and 3 enclosed with your letter to Mr. Sutton of March 5» 1952, particularly that shown on page 3, will be quite helpful. I suggest that you make the material on each page into a separate exhibit with appropriate headings and furnish me with 25 mimeographed copies. Also please- furnish me with a statement of the source of each of the figures there mentioned and such narrative explanation as is necessary. It is my thought that you would be the best person to put on the witness stand to defend any criticism of the expenses of the Las Vegas office. E. E. Bennett ’