Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000283 97

Image

File
Download upr000283-097.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000283-097
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    September 20,1951 704-35 Mir. Wm. Eeiahardt - Los Angeles vVM (. CG-Mr. A. E. Stoddard NeiCDl 24: 19^'* Mr. W. H. Hulsizer Mr. E. E. Bennett-Los Angeles) This refers to yoar letter of August 29, 1951 to Mr. Stoddard about the inaccuracies, discrepancies, etc* con­tained in the ruling made by the Public Service Commission of Nevada on the application of the Las Vegas Land and Water Com­pany for an increase in water rates far the city of Las Vegas* Herewith statement showing certain inaccuracies developed from a review of the ruling as applied to the dis­tribution facilities owned by the LVL&W Co. In addition to the items shown on the statement, attention is called to page 2 of the ruling wherein the LVL&W Co. is stated to have been incorporated on April 29, 1905, whereas our records show the date of incorporation as May 2, 1905. Also, on page 21 it is noted that the Commission has arbitrarily used a flat rate of 2% for depreciation instead of the rates based on service lives which were testified to at the hearing* Similar comments on inaccuracies contained in the ruling as applying to the production facilities owned by LA&SLRR Co ., will be furnished you as soon as our study has been completed. Enel*