Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000204 290

Image

File
Download upr000204-290.tif (image/tiff; 23.37 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000204-290
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    I % Los Angeles, December 4* 1951 WM. R. Mr. Wm. Reinhardt: DEC 4 1951 (cc - Mr. W. R. Rouse) For some time I have been giving thought to the advan­tages which would result from the transfer of the water pro­duction facilities of the Railroad Company to the distribu­tion company at Las Vegas. It appears to me that there are some decided advantages in making the transfer. There are also some problems. The most serious problem the Water Company and the Rail-^ road face is the continual demand for expansion of their fa­cilities. The Railroad Company, either directly with respect to its own facilities or through non-interest bearing loans to the Water Company, has expended a very large amount of money in expanding the water production and distribution fa­cilities at Las Vegas in the last several years. At the same time it is apparently facing a politically minded Com­mission which is reluctant to permit the Water Company to make rates high enough to pay a fair return on the combined investment. I am certain that no independent company could have borrowed money in the State of Nevada or elsewhere to make the capital expenditures which have been made by the Railroad Company and the Water Company in the face of the earnings, or rather deficits, which the Water Company has suffered in the past two or three years. If an independent company had been operating the water system in Las Vegas, I am certain that by the very force of circumstances the Com­mission would have been compelled to grant it rates which would have made the lending of money to the Company attrac­tive to investors. I think the Water Company would be in a much better bar­gaining position in dealing with the Commission with respect to rates if the Railroad Company were disassociated entirely from water production and distribution except as the owner of the Water Company. In such event the Railroad could refuse to loan money to the Water Company for expansion of plant un­til the earnings of the Water Company were brought up to the point which would justify a loan from outside sources. With a proper capital structure for the water distribution company the Railroad Company would be not only the owner of the equity capital but also of a loan large enough to make impossible the procuring of outside capital by the Water Company unless prop­er earnings were being realized.