UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
«r mbbblm MaM&M. ,^agj»Jai Revenue, expense m4 rate base figures that hav# bean developed and discussed ray now bs brought together io as to deteridno the net oarnings and rata of return realised frost the 1949 operation* and similarly what results in$r be expected from the year 1950 at the presently effective rater rate*. Having thus determined the results of operation on the various base* at present rata* the adjustments la not and gross revenues figures ray tin# be made to yi#M a fair rate of return, which for the eSHpany i* vierad a* not: l**a thin 61 per went* The detail a* to the development of these figures are aet forth la the Appendix under mix tables, h to <i, inclusive* Table* L, M and 1 rat forth the results for the years 1969 and 1950 estimated on the three different bases, and under the actual condition in which the Las Vegas Iratgr Utility yn*er*v ract-Ac e'ip,loe:::^Tw6HNdBS Esllroad PtiSV&xt. are* freseat Total cross Revenue Required *1. Less cross Revenue Resent Tims iu as seen mass increase® in gross revenue require- rants arat Inrastrant Original Cost estrant hay Post Cost Cost Revenues Eapenraa $214,000 $214,000 $214,000 322,931 351.813 870,083 let Revenue Bate Base Kate of Return l.ro% $ 64,576 $ 59,967 $ 63,916 21,069 24,477 33,044 Operating Expenses Kates Increase Required ~ Amount B:'5
