Information
Digital ID
upr000279-043
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Mr. 1. C. Renwick Rate Spread (continued) -3- You may not desire to disturb the Motels* I would be Inclined to raise the house rate not more than 10# * This would carry through to the first step in the Motel* Such a change, with the 2# for additional lawn yardage, would give an added revenue of <£8,1*83 a year. The system integrated return would be on the Historical basis and 5*9% on the Investment basis* Having in mind possible higher actual revenues, as well as certain items that will probably be disallowed, an additional increase of soiwhere in this range would be all that is needed* I would rather hesitate to make any revised filing for higher rates* I feel there would be too much adverse reaction and, in the end, you probably will not receive any benefit dollarwise from it* I trust this review may be helpful* What is needed is a complete set up of the rate spread. Very truly yours, RAW :w "'"""Woy b-l HeEe las.