Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
' IVF A review of the Investment costs as charged will show there are no amounts for - Aect* @01 * Organisation Acct. SOS * Franchises Asets. 351-366 - General Overhead Expenditure* Aoet. 322 * Services Sush items of actual incurred costs probably haws amounted to not less than; Organization General Construction Overheads at 10# Services 4800 at $12 each fetal IShlle under the system of accounting employed these items are charged to operating expenses, yet as a matIter of fact, for the moat part, water revenues faid in by the oonSna^l of the service have not paid for these items. Any analysis will readily show this to be substantially true for the reason{l) that corporate expenses, Including most of the general engineering, legal, financing and general administrative costs associated with construction, have been done by the Onion Pacific with only limited charges to tha Water Company, and (2) a review of the historical operations of the Company (fable 1) shows that but limited earnings were realised with deficits in several of the years. Water Rights Th© added worth that a water works property has above the value of Its physical plant, because of a particular and additional strategic and beneficial value flowing from a favorable water supply, is well recognised. The method of evaluating such added value, and the amount to be attached and to be included in the rate base of a public utility for the purpose of testing rates, is a question upon which commissions and courts differ. In the instant case, however, there can be no question $5,000 80,000 87,600 $142,600