Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000278 181

Image

File
Download upr000278-181.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000278-181
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    ' IVF A review of the Investment costs as charged will show there are no amounts for - Aect* @01 * Organisation Acct. SOS * Franchises Asets. 351-366 - General Overhead Expenditure* Aoet. 322 * Services Sush items of actual incurred costs probably haws amounted to not less than; Organization General Construction Overheads at 10# Services 4800 at $12 each fetal IShlle under the system of accounting employed these items are charged to operating expenses, yet as a matIter of fact, for the moat part, water revenues faid in by the oonSna^l of the service have not paid for these items. Any analysis will readily show this to be substantially true for the reason{l) that corporate expenses, Including most of the general engineering, legal, financing and general administrative costs associated with construction, have been done by the Onion Pacific with only limit­ed charges to tha Water Company, and (2) a review of the historic­al operations of the Company (fable 1) shows that but limited earnings were realised with deficits in several of the years. Water Rights Th© added worth that a water works property has above the value of Its physical plant, because of a particular and ad­ditional strategic and beneficial value flowing from a favorable water supply, is well recognised. The method of evaluating such added value, and the amount to be attached and to be included in the rate base of a public utility for the purpose of testing rates, is a question upon which commissions and courts differ. In the instant case, however, there can be no question $5,000 80,000 87,600 $142,600