Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000066 151

Image

File
Download upr000066-151.tif (image/tiff; 26.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000066-151
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    1 2 3 4 5 6 % 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ------------------------------------------------------------ A* If they went long enough, that would be true* Qo Hew, you stated that In your opinion meters would re­duce consumption around two and a half million gallons per day during the peak period* A. X think 1 used e percentage of 20 and 25% of the flow during the peak period, which would be equivalent* Q. feu heerd the testimony given here yesterday, that while the restrictions were imposed, the use of water was reduc­ed to about three end a half million gallons per day. A. Xes. Q. And you also heard the testimony of problems that arose when the production or the use was decreased two and a half mil­lions per day* A. That’s right. Q. Xn other words, tho motors might reduce the use but it might create shortages; isn't that true? A* Mot exactly. The advantage of the meters would be if people have to pay for water they use, and net needed for the raising of lawns, why they would shut that water off. That would bo the saving, Xn other words, there would be no excess of use for irrigation throughout the day* Q* four contention is that the people wouldn't raise their lawns if they had to pay for the water. A, X didn't say that. Q, Analyse your statement* A* Analyse it this way—that it would prevent excess use for irrigation and other uses. Qft Mow, if the meters would reduce consumption around two