Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000048 70

Image

File
Download upr000048-070.tif (image/tiff; 23.43 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000048-070
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Los Angeles, September 1?, 1942 20-334-1 Mr. E. J. Doolie: Referring to your letter of August 25, file D-386-4 relative to water produced at Las Vegas, Nevada and sold to Las Vegas Land and Water Company. Division Engineer Mr. J, P. Mack conferred with Mr. Walter Bracken at Las Vegas, Nevada on September 12 regard­ing this matter and as result of this conference recommend that we eliminate from the statements furnished you the amount of water going to the ranch as being chargeable against the Onion Pacific Railroad Company, fhis will change the per­centage of the water chargeable to the Onion Pacific Railroad Company and the LVL&W Co. accordingly. For example, in the year 1941, by eliminating amount of water diverted to the ranch totaling 5,380.063 will make the total consumed 1,742,127,93V, and this will make the Onion Pacific*s portion during this year 14.8# and LVL&W Co. 85.2#. In the year 1939 we indicated 674,180,052 gal­lons diverted to the ranch and using this figure your state­ment reflects Onion Pacific*s portion as 48.33# and LVL&W Co. 51.6?#. By eliminating the quantity reported going to the ranch, the changed percentage would be 13.6# and @1.4# respectively. It is my opinion that the water diverted to the ranch sho aid not be considered in arriving at charges to Las Vegas Land and Water Company. The same applies for the years 1937 and 1938. G. 0. Fish ec Mr. W. R. Bracken Mr. R. M. Sutton