upr000276 40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 tliat ®o much w m be lag wasted thst be care to expand, I don t think he need the expression knot enough water.* t.- s it your opinion that the condition ©mild be o va r» coma and the source of waste eliminated b- conservative method® within the power of the water company? A ' !ly opinion of th * "***9 of water in this town is lack 0f pres, sure. X bare a sprinkler on ly law. X nee a A s and t will place a sprinkler on the lawn and it will cover about five f.«t in dlftatmtnr and T lay it there and go away and try doing some, thing else and when T corns b ok it has flooded art area, and if y m bad pressure and could sprinkle it down, I don,t think you would wm-ate half the water that is being wasted. That is my belief, &H, SKXTOIff What is the lack of pressure due to? A * *00 mains. X think there is plenty of water up there, MR. SMITH! Bo you. think*! era ^ust seeking general information, do you think a greater manure of co-operation between the city 'government and the water company whereby the city government could 8.mm& more regulations of water use upon lawns and gardens would to some extant, remedy the present situation? 1. X don*t think there is any question of ti, Q. I a there any measure of cooperation along those lines now be. twees the city and water company? A* yot th'-t I know of* *"* raqulations, so for a® your information goes, or we,ter use, is vested entirely is the water company? A, v*s, sir, f don*t believe that the city has taken any interest or made any ml'.?? a a® to the use of water, Q. What would be your-you know there la a law m towns of popu. let on of 4500 people or more prohibiting the tie® of meters by water coupanlea? A, x have beard that* Wh;it is your personal opinion as the advisability of in. stalling sitter© in tas Tsgaa as a water conservation measure? k* I den#t believ© it la necessary at all, I sincerely believe —1®.