Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000270 163

Image

File
Download upr000270-163.tif (image/tiff; 23.4 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000270-163
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Las Vegas "Morning Sun" -August 18, 1950 V S / M - 1 1 * 1 1,50 Vegas Uses Less W ater W ithout \ j Curbs, Report Says A report on the recent 15-day study rf)f water usage in Las Vegas, during a test period after restrictions against daytime lawn w atering were lifted, showed less ! consumption than that reported i i; by the Las Vegas La n d and W a- •5 ter Co. during the tim e the ban was in force, C ity Engineer W . : C. Anderson said yesterday. Anderson said the water com­pany reported an average daily | usage of 14,000,000 gallons dur-ing the sum m er m onths when the restriction against daytime sprinkling was enforced. Th e city engineer’s 15-day figures Showed an average daily usage of 12,697,894 gallons w ithout re­strictions: H e pointed out that during the W" M. X AlK 2 2 1950 15 days; two rainstorms' occurred, which dropped the usage to about 8,000,000 gallons on those ' days and . lowered the average, but that on only three days of the 15 ' did the total daily gallpnage exceed 14,000,003. : Listed are Anderson’s figures, of usage by date: J u ly 27 1A 28 . . 8,438.100’ 11.460.900 29 13.296.500 30 _ . / 12.912.100 31 _ 13,122,100 A u g. 1 11,868,400 2 _ .. 13,344,700 3 — s. 13.259.800 4 . 13,818,500 ? 5 _ . l 13,726,900 6 _ . 13.290,100 ?. 7 ?* 13,166,500 ' 8 14,004,600 9 _ 14,233,500 10 14,293,300 H i 8,930,300 J u ly 26, approxim ately }/z inch rain. A u gust 10, approxim ately % inch rain.: T h e City engineer’s report rec­ommended nb furthe r compuls- \ ory restrictions on the public, but. a continued rigid enforce­ment of the watfer waste ordi­nance. “W ith out the waste of water,” Anderson stated, “Las Vegas; can get along nicely without re^trie- . uons ? oh its ' outdoor watering habits.. , 1 I