UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
\ ?2- 1957 - 1962 1963 - 1967 1968 - 197^ 1975 - 1980 1981 - 1989 1990 Average Interest $680,000 @ 64 $7^,000 $ 3^5 $1,375,000 • 3 - 3 / ^ $1,590,000 • 3.9056 $3 ,385,000 @ b.iofi $925,000 @ 3 .70# ------- 3.9707$ This is comparable to NuSteen & Company with 3*972$ An error in typing was claimed, on the 1990 submission, whether it was 725,000 or 925,000. However, it was clarified that amount was correct as shown, $925,000. Mr. Pelikan representing the Nutteen & Company Associates claimed that the above bid had been altered. However, Mr. Beebe, representing the Water District, stated that any alteration made was immaterial as bid was for full amount of bond issue. Haupt & Company, et al, also made several conditions, such as, the firm of O'Melveny & Myers are to check as to legality. Their agent was stipulated to be the Bank of America at main office in San Francisco, or Chicago, or New York. Mr. Cory stated he was of the opinion that the 3r& bid by Haupt & Co and Cruttenden & Company would receive the award. Mr. Cory advised the above in detail would be submitted in a letter today to Omaha and Mr, Reinhardt would receive a copy.
