Information
Digital ID
upr000062-263
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.(Based on 194S Expenses} m 9 j i m p Total 96.51$ to LVL&WCo. Maintenance #20,320.31 50.00 #19,570.49 48.16 General Expenses (Insurance) Depreciation (736,16$ x .04) Taxes (773,150 x 1.75) 29,526.56 13,530.13 18,437.05 13,030.87 100 Interest (773,150 x .06) Total 46,389.03 The billing for 1950, predicated upon 1949 expenses, results In & total cost for water.produced of #117,348.92, of which 97.32$ m will be billed to the Water Utility, or #114,203.97. An analysis has been made of the basis of the charges, and while, for purpose of this study, adjusted amounts for the years 1949 and 1950 have been set up on a somewhat different basis, the analysis indicates that the billings based upon the contract yield charges that are somewhat low rather than high® In making this analysis as to what the has Vegas Land and Water Company should pay for the water purchased from the production company, the same procedure was followed in setting up the annual costs of operation as for the Water Company iteelf. Following is a summary tabulation of the costs of operation as developed for the Production Company, using in this instance investment cost as the basis for depreciation and interest charges: