Information
Digital ID
upr000092-023
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Commission Indiana Kansas Maine Maryland Michigan Missouri Case Re Rockford Electric Co. P. U. R. 1925 D-154. Re Laporte Gas & Electric * Co., P. U. R. 1921 A-824. Re Indiana General Service Co., P. U. R. 1921 A-337. E. Chicago v. E. Chicago & Indiana Harbor Water Co. P. U. R. 1922 A-193. Re City of East Chicago. P. U. R. 1925 C-422. Re Parsons Ry. & Lt. Co. (1911, 1912) 1 Biennial Rep. K. P. U. C 97. Re York County Water Co. P. U. R. 1921 A-439. Re Central Maine Power Co., P. U. R. 1922 C-36. Re United Rys. & Electric Co. P. U. R. 1926 0 4 4 1 . Williamston v. Williams-ton Illuminating Cb. P. U. R. 1917 C-121. Re Michigan State Tel. Co. P. U. R. 1918 C-81. Re Kansas City Gas Co. P. U. R. 1920 0 4 1 . Re Missouri Gas & Elec. Service Co. P. U. R. 1921 D-687. Re Kahoka Tel. & Constr. Co. P. U. R. 1926D-701. Re Jackson County Lt., Ht. & Pr. Co. doing Vain* % 15.0% 9.1% 15.5% 10.9% 10.0% ("liberal”) 12.3% 8.6% 8 # % 12# % (Not including about 11% additional for easements.) 16.7% 8.0% 10.0% (For intangibles including going value.) 10.0% 10.0% 8.0%