Information
Digital ID
upr000278-197
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.The following tabulation shows for domestic metered service in various cities what $ (1) 4>696 cubic feet of water per month would cost* and (2) the quantity of water (cubic feet) that $2.19 would purchase in one month: Cost of Cubic ft. 4.696 cu. ft. for 12.19 Bakersfield) California #5*02 1»492 Barstow, California 5*45 1»752 Glendale, California 6.10 1,605 Hanford, California 6.04 1,161 Los Angeles, California 6.79 1,400 Los Angeles suburbs,-So.Calif. Water Co.5*05 1,055 n n n Gallf.Water Service Co.6.19 1,293 National City, California 11.09 Palm Springs, Califomia 10.04 016 Phoenix, Ariaona 5.17 1,991 LAS VEGAS| NEVADA 2,19 4,696 Thus it is seen for the amount of water used at present rates, the water hill of Las Vegas is indeed low - but a fraction of what it is in many other cities. At the proposed increase the average would still be slightly under #3.00 a month (#2.90), & very low figure. The second column of the comparison shows how relatively few cubic feet of water the Las Vegas customers* dollar billing would purchase on the other systems. Flat-rate charges on the other systems in reference to domestic service (see^j^buls^ion bestow) indicate that while all such charges appear low, yet Las Vegas charges, both actual and proposed, are not unfavorable.