Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000026 11

Image

File
Download upr000026-011.tif (image/tiff; 25.78 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000026-011
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    LAS VEGAS MORNING SUN January 11, 1951 Agent For New Tract Defends; Project In Realty Investigation Tentative approval of the pro­posed Hidden Village';housing j project has been granted by the ! City of Las Vegas, according to : an announcement yesterday by.: C. H, Elstner, of the Elstner ; Realty Co., representing the builder, K. H. Vitt’,: of Pocatello, Idaho. Eisner’s declaration came on the heels of an announcement Board of Realtors > that it had ! made yesterday by the Las Vegas j been requested to"investigate the J project. Investigation by the board of I realtors, according to an official I j of the organisation, disclosed that ; the. land in the subdivision had j pot been recorded or approved; by ; the city. But Elstner declared: “Hidden | Village has been given the go-j ahead sign by the builder, K. H. f ? V}tt,, who advised us that he has f | submitted plans for tentative ap- ? prove I by the Veterans Adminis­tration and is awaiting the set- | ting of | fair price and final I approval. i; “The plot has been tentatively .accepted by Las Vegas City Com­missioners and the final approval ig subject to the submission of | the plan by Vitt’s surveyor, and { ' filing of the approval of the Planning Board,” The new $2,000,000 tract devel- ] opment was ordered investigated j at the request of Mason fjoice, chief appraiser. of the VA in Los Angeles, according to. the Realty Board. The action was ordered after the Model Homes Of Las I 1 Vegas Co, originators of the pro- i ject,’; reportedly failed to obtain the approval of the Veterans’ Ad- r ministration on the.tract and the ? sale irice of the homes. According to Moice, the matter wag brought to 'the attention of i the VA by inquiries from vefer- • ans of Lasf Vegas concerning the ; advisability of mahing .purchases in the proposed tract. A