Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Los Angeles - Jan. 4, 1952 Nr. Wm. Reinhardt: cot Nr. W.H. Johnson - Las Vegas (& enc) You will recall that the Water District was going to advise us the amount of land it desired to purchase in case it acquired the production facilities of the railroad in Las Vegas. Z enclose for your information, eopy of letter dated December 11, 1951# from Hr. Hugh A. Shamberger, State Engineer, to Colonel H.F. Clark, Engineer of the Water District and eopy of letter dated January 3, 1952, from Col. Clark to me I also enclose my rally copy of the drawing referred to in the letters which Z would appreciate your returning for ay file. After considering these two letters, Z gather that the District feels they want to purchase only the 679**2 acres although Nr. Shamberger*s letter states that in his opinion the District should purchase "all of the land as indicated on the drawing”. The drawing outlines in red line, presumably, the total twelve hundred plus acres and then Indicates in red color the 679*42 acres, and Z assume that Colonel Clark is referring to the 679*42 acres as Mthe water bearing lands”. In connection with the action of the Public Service Commission in cutting down the land which we included in our rate case, to 240 acres, it is interesting to note Nr. Shamberger 's comments that "it is too bad that the Water Company didn’t retain more land surrounding their wells than they did • Stic