Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000065 253

Image

File
Download upr000065-253.tif (image/tiff; 26.29 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000065-253
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Los Angeles - Jan. 4, 1952 Nr. Wm. Reinhardt: cot Nr. W.H. Johnson - Las Vegas (& enc) You will recall that the Water District was going to advise us the amount of land it desired to purchase in case it acquired the production facilities of the railroad in Las Vegas. Z enclose for your information, eopy of letter dated December 11, 1951# from Hr. Hugh A. Shamberger, State Engineer, to Colonel H.F. Clark, Engineer of the Water District and eopy of letter dated January 3, 1952, from Col. Clark to me I also enclose my rally copy of the drawing referred to in the letters which Z would appreciate your returning for ay file. After considering these two letters, Z gather that the District feels they want to purchase only the 679**2 acres although Nr. Shamberger*s letter states that in his opinion the District should purchase "all of the land as indicated on the drawing”. The drawing outlines in red line, presumably, the total twelve hundred plus acres and then Indicates in red color the 679*42 acres, and Z assume that Colonel Clark is referring to the 679*42 acres as Mthe water bearing lands”. In connection with the action of the Public Service Commission in cutting down the land which we included in our rate case, to 240 acres, it is interesting to note Nr. Sham­berger 's comments that "it is too bad that the Water Company didn’t retain more land surrounding their wells than they did • Stic