upr000281 102

Mr. William Reinhardt - #2 Well No. Applicant Permit No. Affidavit By "At least" 3 LVL&W Co. 10458 LVL&W Co. that at $13,745.92 its expense expend-ed 4 LVL&W Co. 10508 i t h 5 LVL&W Co. 10,924.00 10706 I t H 6 4,869.74 LVL&W Co. 10707 « t i 7 LVL&W Co. 10867 7,630.26 LVL&W Co. that 9»tS 4,500.00 its expense and at expense of UPRR for use and benefit of LVL&W Co. there has 8 LVL&W Co. been expended 10868 i t tt 9 LVL&W Co. 10869 t t tt 5,000.00 10 LVL&W Co. 10870 i t i i 4,500.00 11 LVL&W Co. 11249 t t n 10,000.00 16,277.00 It will he noted three affidavits were filed in connection with Well No. 1, one by the LA&SLRR Co. and two by the LVL&W Co. also that two affidavits were filed by LVL&W Co. in connection with Well No. 2, although in the case of Well No. 2 Proof of Application of Water to Beneficial Use was filed only under Permit No. 10127 as it covered all water produced by the Well. The Affidavits of Completion of Work filed by LVL&W Co. pursuant to Permit Nos. 10458, 10508, 10706, and 10707 state the expenditures were made at expense of applicant whereas all other affidavits filed by LVL&W Co. state the expenditures were made at expense of applicant and at expense of either LA&SLRR Co. or UPRR Co. for use and benefit of applicant. All affidavits contain the statement that "at least" a named amount of money has been expended. Some of the amounts may be actual cost although