Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000196 123

Image

File
Download upr000196-123.tif (image/tiff; 27.62 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000196-123
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    \ By-Laws November 4-, 1932 Las Vegas Land & Water Company. Mr . - E. E. C a lv in , V ice P r e s id e n t. Bear S ir: R e fe r rin g to your l e t t e r o f October 26th en closin g d r a ft o f new o f Las Vegas Land & Water Company: I submitted tfcesa to Mr. MoNames and he s ta te s th at they are in accordance with the Nevada laws* except as noted below . From a p r a c t ic a l standpoint i t seems to ms they meet the s itu a tio n in a gen eral way, but I would lik e to c a l l your a tte n tio n tc a few suggestions- The”e is an apparent c o n flic t between Sections 1 J and 58 o f the Corporation Law# o f Nevada r e la t iv e to the c lo s in g o f tr a n s fe r books* In other words, there is a question whether t h f p ro v is io n s o f the By-Laws co n tro l over the S ta tu te s . The s ta tu te s p ro vid e that tra n s fe r books should bo clo sed twenty dftyf precedin g the date o f the stock h o ld ers' meeting, and un­le s s th e re is o b je c tio n th ere to , change be made. fouid recommend th at th is ;l it Section 4 o f A r t ic le I p ro vid es th at in the absence o f ’ the frees!dent oh Vice P resid en t the Board o f D ire c to rs ap­p o in t a chairman o f the s to c k h o ld e rs 1 m eeting. This, i t seems to flja, could w e ll be changed, to conform to the usual p r a c tic e p f 'having the stockholders present e le c t a chairman o f the m eeting. How would the Board o f D irecto ra be ab le to a c t . i f a ..-'meeting were c a lle d whan n e ith e r o f sa id o f f i c e r s was present^ A'Undalf S ection 2 of. A r t ic le XI the regu la r meetings o f the / A B o a fd o f D ire c to rs s h a ll be h eld on the f i r s t Tuesday a f t e r the f i r s t Monday in each month, w h ile S ection 2 o f A r t ic le I p ro v id ­es th at the annual meeting o f the stockholders f o r the purpose o f e le c t in g d ir e c to r s s h a ll be held on the seoend Monday o f November. ' This might make an in terim between the e le c t io n o f the d ir e c to r s and the; f i r s t meeting th e r e a fte r o f two weeks or more. Under the laws o f Nevada d ir e c to r s are not req u ire d to f i l e oaths o f o f f i c e , the Secretary only being req u ired to f i l e an oath o f o f f i c e . T h erefo re, might i t £ th a t!th e annual meeting o f the stockholders ehai f i r s t Tuesday a ft e r the f i r s t Monday in November, that d ir e c t o r s 1 meeting could be h eld im m ediately a ft e r the stockholders meeting fo r the purpose o f o rga n isin g the board? be wf i l l to p:ro v i de s h a ll be >. -,*?» ,* lia* W*. OXl the mb a r , so that a