Information
Digital ID
upr000175-375
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.hm Y«ga§ * March § 45 Mr, m« s, »&rk# « a®n© { oo - Mr. E, 1, Bennett Mr, 0, X, Coxy) a«f«rrtag to Hr, Bennett1# letter March 7 tli, and supplementing mine of March 2nd regarding AS-298, proposing a fere percent tax m nue# of public utilitiesl $ m ® reve2 believe t&*> amendment proposed fay Mr* Bennett would fae beneficial, but I suggest the Insertion of the word# *or other consideration* after “permit fee*, the reason for tbit is that the LVLfcW Co, does not pay the City a money fe* for our existing permit to use the oity street# and alley#, last w# da grant them a consideration in the for® of free water service for fire hydrant# and municipal buildings, 'ihe same is true of the local poorer coqpssiy, which grants the City & special lev rat# for street lighting, etc. A, M, f*elger