Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000061 159

Image

File
Download upr000061-159.tif (image/tiff; 23.12 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000061-159
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Increase I n w a t e r r a t e e , L a e V e g a s : Las Vegas, Levada, April 1, 1922, V 23*6 Mr* F, B. MoEazaee, General Attorney, Los Angeles, Calif, Dear bir: deferring to your letter of March £6, to Leo A, Mclamee, copy to me, with attached copy of Mr, Gray's letter March 17th and statement to Mr* Knickerbocker, regard-* lag the Increase in water rates at Lae Vegas, effective Oct­ober 1st, 1981: The application for increase in water rates was first planned in the early part of 1929, although for a number of years prior to that time, such an application had been anti** alpsted, and a good many of our chargee to Operating Expense® were made with that thought in mind, II § 1\ 'v At the time instructions were received to increase the water rate® 100 per cent, m did not interpret them as mean* lag literally that the old schedule of 1909 (which is obsolete* providing charges for many classes of service which no longer exist and caultting som of the more important new services) should^ be fust doubled, but that the schedule should be so re*vcmped as to develop ms near as possible a 100 per cent increase la revenue• la doing this, we provided in every instance where m thought we could support it before the Public service sion, a 100 per cent increase in the flat basic rate, but in most oases did not increase the charge for extra services, such aer-if toilet and hath, extra chair in barber shop, etc. *§ p\. * 1 »