UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
% FILE MEMO t=.v w. File 80-11, Vol. 6M W 1854 In a conversation with E. M. Kerrigan by telephone he told me that the Estimated Purchase Price of $2,475,046.18 contained in Mr. Sutton's letter of May -21, 1954, was a projection of the actual figure of $3,317*663.42 of April 30, 1954, agreed to by the District accountants with a contingency of approximately $30,000. He suggested that if we desired to increase this figure, we might round it out by adding $74,953.82 or making it $2,550,000. He said from discussions with Mr. Maag he did not anticipate that the August 1st figure would be substantially different from the July 1st figure. E. C.R. 5-26-54
