Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000285 350

Image

File
Download upr000285-350.tif (image/tiff; 26.85 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000285-350
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    %m road to th is water from Las Vegas Spring, and i s purchasing from the R ailroad s u ffic ie n t to serve C la rk ’ s Las Vegas Towns!te under the franchisee h eld by i t As the r ig h t to the use o f a l l o f the water o f Las Vegas sprin g vested in Helen J. Stewart and her grantees on March 1, 1905, the date th at the f i r s t comprehensive water law in Nevada took e f f e c t , I do not see how the r ig h ts o f e ith e r company can be a f f e c t ­ed as to th is vested r ig h t , as th ere is no doubt but th at a f u l l and complete a p p lic a tio n to a b e n e fic ia l use was made o f a l l o f the water a t a l l times. I t may be th at p ro o f o f ap p rop riation should have been f i l ­ed a ft e r the passage o f the law o f 1905, o r i t could be f i l e d now, i f there were any r e la t iv e r ig h ts to be esta b lish ed , but as there have been no other claimants & r any r ig h ts to the waters o f th is stream other than Helen J. Stewart and her successors, I f a i l to see where the f i l i n g o f any p ro o f o f ap p rop riation now would serve any u s efu l purpose. The amended a r t ic le s o f in corp oration o f Los Angeles & S a lt Lake R ailroad Company, f i l e d w ith the County ule r k a t Las Vegas on August 31, 1923, au th orizes the r a ilr o a d to acquire water to serve m u n ic ip a litie s as a d is tr ib u t o r . This o f course would c o n stitu te the r a ilr o a d a pu blic u t i l i t y , which- b efo re th is amendment- we have sought from time to time to avoid , and do avoid by f i l i n g copies o f our con tracts w ith the Public S ervice Commission under S ection 37 o f the Public S ervice law o f Nevada o f 1919. Unless the conveyance re c e iv e d from Mrs. Stewart- or made subsequent th e re to , exp ressly tra n s fe rs o r attempts to tra n s fe r-the waters o f Las Vegas Spring, I am o f the opinion th at the Las Vegas Land & Water Co, a t a l l times was the owner o f a l l o f the waters r is in g and flo w in g therefrom , except what was acquired by the R ailroad Co. e ith e r by permission o f Las Vegas Land & Water Co. or p o s s ib ly by adverse u ser, and the R ailroad would be safe in making a p p lic a tio n f o r the underground water f o r r a ilr o a d purposes, and under the amendment, the a r t ic le s o f in corp oration would be broad enough to permit the a p p lic a tio n to the uses exp ressly authorized in i t s a r t ic le s o f in corp oration . I I w i l l w r ite you fu rth e r when I have examined c a r e fu lly the e a r ly record t i t l e s to the land upon which th is water was a p p lied to a b e n e fic ia l use. FRM-H F. R. MOM AMU