Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000269 325

Image

File
Download upr000269-325.tif (image/tiff; 23.28 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000269-325
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

% Mr. H, A. 1 General Aud Omaha, Web* I»a3 Veg&s - dune 1®, 193® W 93**? Dear Sirs Last Saturday. June 17th, a public hearing wec bald in the Courthouse at Lag togas by the Public Service Commission of Nevada with regard to complaint file d by Jake Bookley regarding refusal of the Watat Company to supply hi® with water in Block *H* of the Park Addition* Water Company fey my assistant Mr. Polger and General Attorney MoHsmee* The Park Addition is loomted south of Charleston Boulevard in a d is t r ic t where the Water Company has no mains and it would be necessary fo r us to lay approximately s ix hundred feet of pipe to.serve one customer. A ll th is was fu lly explained to the Commission and they took the matter under advisement. went thoroughly into the subject of the la te r Company supplying water to various outlying d is tric ts which are not now served by our mains. He also had thoroughly gone into the annual reports submitted to the Commission during the past nine years and stated that these annual reports were not satisfactory to the Commission- inasmuch as they fa ile d to show the amount of cash on hand, I attach a statement which he prepared fro® information furnished in the annual report and he asked why the #94 ,933 accumulated- in the P ro fit and Loss Account over th is period of years was not shown as cash opposite item i l l on f i r s t sheet of annual report* I advised him f would take the matter up with you. W ill you kindly advise me what reply X should make to Mr, Sexton. The meeting was attended on behalf of the In the course of the hearing Chairman Saxton