Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000048 133

Image

File
Download upr000048-133.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000048-133
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr* F* H. Knickerbocker - 2 ' 4/22/27 At the present time there is available in the pipe line for us© at Las Vegas 2540 0* P.H* or 3,558,000 gallons per day, and flowing from the springs down the creek there is 1369 0.P.M. or 1,971,000 gal­lons per day, which is available for Irrigation purposes* Approximately one-half of the amount flowing down the creek can foe diverted into the f pip© line with a reasonable expenditure* ©1© quantity of water used at Las Vegas is so enormous that an estimate of its distribution is not Much more than a guess5 however, a preliminary analysis has been mad® of the situation with the following results: dais* Per day Percent Osed by LVL and w Company 2,820,000 77*15 Other Purposes 838.000 22*85 Wqter Available for Use 3,658,000 100, The annual charges upon the main pipe line including the facil­ities at the well and spring amount to #7859*17, which divided in ac­cordance with the above percentages indicates that the LVL and W Company should pay annually #6056*84 or approximately #500.00 per month for fee use of our facilities, ifeiCfo figure compares with the #200*00 per month flat rate stipulated in Contract Audit Ho. 2850-A. If it is desired to prepare a new contract at the present time in lieu of old contract which expired October 1, 1926, the information requested by Mr. Molarne© April 4 can be furnished using the above esti­mated rat© of #500.00 per month until such time as actual measurement has bean made as recommended below* It Is my opinion that we should at once instaL1 meters and