Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000329 11

Image

File
Download upr000329-011.tif (image/tiff; 23.81 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000329-011
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    SUBJECT: F ailu re to Weigh NYC 707304 and PLE 48591 - Band V Steel Consigned Boyle Manufacturing Company. Los Angeles, C a lif., A p ril 23, 1942. / ? ' ? ? Mr. E. E. Bennett: P ile A-155- Attached is copy of b i l l of lading dated A p ril 6 1942, covering two ears of band ste e l, shipped by the Pennsylvania Iron & Steel Company, located on our ra ilro ad , to the Boyle Mfg. Company, located on the Santa Pe at Los Angeles. You w i l l note the following notations appear on b i l l of lading: and consignee cannot arrive at a weight for settlement o f th eir charges, due to the fact that steel in question is odd sized, in various shapes, lengths, and thicknesses. The consignee states they have no way o f weighing shipment, and shipper advises the only way that a weight can be arrived at is for them to load up about 200 tons of stee l that is le f t In th eir Yard, have cars weighed, and then unload th is steel. They say by th is operation they can determine the weight of the ste e l in the two cars in question, due to the fa c t that they have a lump weight on a l l o f the steel that was in th eir Yard p rio r to the time these two cars moved, and advise that i t w i l l cost approximately #500.00 to so handle. I have explained to them that i t was an oversight on our part in not weighing these cars, and advised them that weights that we secure are f o r the assessment of fre ig h t charges only, and not for the benefit of the shipper in arrivin g at the weight of his commodity so that consignee might be rendered an invoice based on ra ilro a d scale weights* However, they in s is t i t was our res­p o n sib ility to weigh these cars and furnish them with a weight c e rtific a te , and have asked me to handle matter and secure a def­in ite decision as to what our f i n a l action w i l l be in regard to assuming the cost of securing weight of the stee l in question. These cars were ordered out to your Mr. Peterson at 4s30 P.M. A p ril 6th, with instructions to weigh, but apparently cars "Oars must be weighed heavy and also weighed lig h t. "C e rtified weight c e rtific a te s in t r ip lic a t e to be mailed to us." The Yard fa ile d to weigh these cars, and the shipper W ill you kindly advise me your opinion in th is regard? cc :Mr.E.Marksheffel