Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000105 273

Image

File
Download upr000105-273.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000105-273
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. W* 1. Sous® 4. January 10, 1952 ®d land Is valuable for residential and Industrial de­velopment, and I can see no advantage in donating it to the District, la its decision in the rate ease the Com­mission disallowed in the rate base all but 200 acres of the land in the vicinity of the wells on the theory that it was not required for water production. Notwithstand­ing this fact, the Chief Engineer of the District h&s re­cently advised me that the District is desirous of acquir­ing the 679*42 acres of land aa well as necessary rights of xm j for transmission lines and pow er lines end this on the advice ©f the State later Engineer. My suggestion is that the amount o f land'to be donated be carefully consid­ered and the minimum amount donated* I have another suggestion which is related to the re­tention by the Railroad Company of the land lying west of the railroad tracks and east of the water field. The • pewsr lines and transmission lines which cross this area < in most Instances cross in a diagonal manner so as to bad­ly cut up the property and interfere with its ultimate de­velopment. Mr. Reinhardt and I have been recently discuss­ing the desirability of s adopting some plan to eliminate this condition sad to provide for a single transmission line from the water field to the distribution system so located as to foster the beet development of our proper­ty. If we should donate the water system to the District, I would suggest that it be done on the condition that the District re-arrange the location of the transmission lines end power lines in a manner satisfactory to us, I think that Mr. Kulsissr's.suggestion should be giv­en serious consideration by oar tax people and the manage­ment because if it is more advantageous to donate the sys­tem than to sell it, I can see no reason why this should not he done, 1 am sending you three extra ©©pits ©f this letter so that you can furnish them to the interested parties in 0- maha if you desire to do so. SGR:MSB ' I* K. Bennett Inel.3 bee - Mr. Wm. Reinhardt: Herewith copy of Mr. Hulsizer’s letter to Mr. Stod­dard of January 7, 1952.