Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000341 131

Image

File
Download upr000341-131.tif (image/tiff; 23.4 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000341-131
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

“LAS VISAS ESVIEW-JOUMAL” , Wednesday, September 2k, 1952 Water Company Asflff PSC To Ignore City Hearing Plea The Las Vegas Land and Water company today . asked the public service commission to ignore the demand by Las Vegas city commissioners for a hearing on the community’s water problem, i! BBBFvS E. E. Benhett of Los Angeles, w B—I—-—-7------ -—1—m I general-counsel for UP, blamed the critical shortage this sum­mer on violations of the con­servation program and lack of cooperation by the people and city officials. “Put teeth in the (water con­servation) ordinances and en-force it,” Bennett urged the PSC, in answer to a letter written to Carson City by local government officials. The attorney said a UP sur­vey showed on one day during ' the summer heat wave which just ended, that 17 residents out of 61 checked were watering their lawns on the wrong day. Mayor C. D. Baker, comment­ing on UP’s position, said the move was “just a stall.” Baker said the water company implied that the whole fault rested with the conservation program, While the real reason was that the util­ity had not gone “as far as it should” in providing additional, expanded facilities. Baker said he could not con­done the dissipation of any of the city’s resources, but he said making that the issue was mis­leading. The rate increase which was won by the water company , re­cently should be used to expand the facilities, according to Bak­er. He said the utility did not deny that the water needed was here “if they wanted to go after it.”B y entrusting everything .to the conservation program, Bak-er continued, we would only_be_ helping UP to make .additional profits without* further risks. ,