Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
“LAS VISAS ESVIEW-JOUMAL” , Wednesday, September 2k, 1952 Water Company Asflff PSC To Ignore City Hearing Plea The Las Vegas Land and Water company today . asked the public service commission to ignore the demand by Las Vegas city commissioners for a hearing on the community’s water problem, i! BBBFvS E. E. Benhett of Los Angeles, w B—I—-—-7------ -—1—m I general-counsel for UP, blamed the critical shortage this summer on violations of the conservation program and lack of cooperation by the people and city officials. “Put teeth in the (water conservation) ordinances and en-force it,” Bennett urged the PSC, in answer to a letter written to Carson City by local government officials. The attorney said a UP survey showed on one day during ' the summer heat wave which just ended, that 17 residents out of 61 checked were watering their lawns on the wrong day. Mayor C. D. Baker, commenting on UP’s position, said the move was “just a stall.” Baker said the water company implied that the whole fault rested with the conservation program, While the real reason was that the utility had not gone “as far as it should” in providing additional, expanded facilities. Baker said he could not condone the dissipation of any of the city’s resources, but he said making that the issue was misleading. The rate increase which was won by the water company , recently should be used to expand the facilities, according to Baker. He said the utility did not deny that the water needed was here “if they wanted to go after it.”B y entrusting everything .to the conservation program, Bak-er continued, we would only_be_ helping UP to make .additional profits without* further risks. ,