Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEVADA ---- 0 O0 ----- IN THE MATTER OF INCREASED RATES FILED BY I THE LAS VEGAS LAND AND WATER COMPANY : I . & S . Docket 52 Heard: May 28 & 2 9 , 1931 Decided: August 28, 1931 APPEARANCES: For the Commission: - J . F . Shaughnessy, Chairman George W. Malone, Commissioner For Las Vegas Land & Water Company: F . R. McNamee,•A tto rn e y Leo A. McNamee, A tto rn ey ,L. P , Drew, Brid ge E ngineer - L. A. & S . L. R. R. Co. L . J . Brungs ,• C h ie f C le rk »? R. D. P e r k i n s , V a lu a tio n E ngineer " b 2* Bracken, V ic e P r e s i d e n t - Las Vegas Land & Water Co, C» T. C o n n o lle y , A s s i s t a n t Agent ” For P r o t e s t a n t s : Roger F o l e y , A tto rn ey R. F . Minter C. J . Harvey A. F. Smith Fred J . George Frank M. Ryan O P I N I O N BY THE COMMISSION On March 7,- 1931 the Las Vegas Land and Water Company f i l e d with t h i s Commission a schedule o f r a t e s to become e f f e c t i v e June 1 , 1 9 3 1 , f o r water s e r v i c e i n the C i ty o f Las Vegas. N otice was given the p u b l i c , as t h i s schedule m a t e r i a l l y in c r e a s e d the r a t e s a t p r e s e n t in e f f e c t . A p r o t e s t was r e c e iv e d and the new schedule o f r a t e s was suspended on May 1 8 , 1931 f o r ' a period o f t h i r t y days, pending h e a r i n g , i n v e s t i g a t i o n and d e c i s i o n in the c a s e ,